Requiem for the American Dream
with Noam Chomsky
DOCUMENTARY - Politics, Philosophy
Gravitas Documentaries
172K subscribers
481,940 views Feb 26, 2023
#noamchomsky #documentary #americandream
REQUIEM FOR THE AMERICAN DREAM is the definitive discourse with Noam Chomsky, widely regarded as the most important intellectual alive, on the defining characteristic of our time - the deliberate concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a select few.
Through interviews filmed over four years, Chomsky unpacks the principles that have brought us to the crossroads of historically unprecedented inequality - tracing a half-century of policies designed to favour the most wealthy at the expense of the majority - while also looking back on his own life of activism and political participation.
Profoundly personal and thought-provoking, Chomsky provides penetrating insight into what may well be the lasting legacy of our time - the death of the middle class and swan song of functioning democracy.
A potent reminder that power ultimately rests in the hands of the governed, REQUIEM is required viewing for all who maintain hope in a shared stake in the future.
#documentary #noamchomsky #americandream
Directed by: Peter D. Hutchinson, Kelly Nyks, Jared P. Scott
====
Intro
[Music]
during the great depression which i'm old enough to remember there was and most of my family were unemployed working class.
there wasn't it was bad you know much worse subjectively than today
but there was an expectation that things were going to get better
there was a real sense of hopefulness there isn't today
inequality is really unprecedented
i'm a feel good total inequality it's like the worst periods of american history
but if you refine it more closely the inequality comes from the extreme wealth in a tiny sector of the population a fraction of one percent
- there were periods like the gilded age in the 20s and the roaring 90s and so on when a situation developed rather similar to this now
- this period is extreme because if you look at the wealth distribution the inequality mostly comes from super wealth literally the top one tenth of a percent
- are just super wealthy not only is it extremely unjust in itself
- inequality has highly negative consequences on the society as a whole
- because the very fact of inequality has a corrosive harmful effect on democracy
[Music] you open by talking about the american dream
- part of the american dream is class mobility you're born poor you work hard you get rich
- it was possible for a worker to get a decent job buy a home, get a car have his children go to school.
- it's all collapsed
imagine yourself in an outside position looking for mars
what do you see in the united states
there are professed values like democracy
in a democracy public opinion is going to have some influence on policy
[Music] and then the government carries out actions determined by the population
that's what democracy means [Music]
it's important to understand that privileged and powerful sectors have never liked democracy and
for very good reasons democracy puts power into the hands of the general population and takes it away from them that's kind of a principle of concentration of wealth and power
[Music]
concentration of wealth yields concentration of power particularly so as the cost of elections skyrockets which kind of forces the political parties into the pockets of major corporations and this political power quickly translates into legislation that
increases the concentration of wealth so fiscal policy like tax policy deregulation rules of corporate governance and a whole variety of measures
political measures designed to increase the concentration of wealth and power
which in turn yields more political power to the same thing
and that's what we've been seeing
so we have this kind of vicious cycle in progress [Music]
you know actually it is so traditional that it was described by adam smith
in 1776 you read the famous wealth of nations [Music]
he says in england the principal architects of policy are the people who own the society in his day merchants and manufacturers and they make sure that their own interests are very well cared
for however grievous the impact on the people of england or others
now it's not merchant manufacturers it's financial institutions and multinational corporations the people who adam smith called the
masters of mankind and they're following the vile maxim all for ourselves and nothing for anyone else.
they're just going to pursue policies that benefit them and harm everyone else and in the absence of a general popular reaction that's pretty much what you'd expect
Freedom and Democracy
[Music] right through american history there's been an ongoing clash between
- pressure for more freedom and democracy coming from below and
- efforts at elite control and domination coming from above
it goes back to the founding of the country, james madison the main framer who was as much of a believer in democracy as anybody in the world that day
nevertheless felt that the united states system should be designed and indeed
with his initiative was designed so that power should be in the hands of the wealthy
because the wealthier the more responsible set of men and therefore the structure of the formal constitutional system placed most power in the hands of the senate remember the senate was not elected in those days it was selected from the wealthy men as madison put it
had sympathy for property owners and their rights
if you read the debates at the constitutional convention madison said the major concern of the society has to be to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority
and he had arguments i suppose everyone had to vote freely he said well the majority of the poor
would get together and they would organize to take away the property of the rich and he said that
would obviously be unjust so you can't have that so therefore the constitutional system has to be set up
to prevent democracy [Music]
which is of some interest that this debate has a hoary tradition goes
back to the first major book on political systems aristotle's politics
he says of all of them the best is democracy but then he points out exactly the flaw
that madison pointed out [Music]
if athens were a democracy for free men the poor would get together and take away the property of the rich
well same dilemma they had opposite solutions aristotle proposed what we would
nowadays call a welfare state he said try to reduce inequality
[Music] so same problem opposite solutions one is reduce inequality you won't have
this problem the other is reduced democracy
if you look at the history of the united states it's a constant struggle between these two tendencies
democratizing tendency that's mostly coming from the population pressure from below and you get this
constant battle going on periods of regression periods of progress the 1960s for example were
a period of significant democratization [Music]
sectors of the population that were usually passive and apathetic
that became organized active started pressing their demands
and they became more and more involved in decision making activism and so on
it just changed consciousness in a lot of ways
[Music] minority rights if democracy means
freedom why are our people free right if democracy means justice why don't we have justice
if democracy means equality why don't we have equality women's rights
this inhuman system of exploitation will change but only if we force it to change
and force it together concern for the environment a unique day in american history is ending a day set aside for a
nationwide outpouring of mankind seeking its own survival opposition to aggression i'd say to those who
criticize us for the militancy of our descent that if they are serious about law and order they should first provide
it for the vietnamese people for our own black people and for our own poor people concern for other people one day we must
ask the question why are there 40 million poor people in america when you begin to ask that question you're
raising a question about the economic system about a broader distribution of wealth to the question of restructuring
the whole of american society these are all civilizing effects [Music]
and that caused great fear [Applause]
i hadn't anticipated the power of i should have but i didn't
anticipate the power of the reaction to the civilizing effects of the 60s
i did not anticipate the strength of the reaction to it
the backlash
The Business Offensive
[Music] there has been an enormous concentrated
coordinated business offensive beginning in the 70s to try to beat back the egalitarian
efforts that went right through the nixon years you see it in many respects i mean over
on the right you see it in things like the famous powell memorandum
[Music] sent to the chamber of commerce the major business lobby by later supreme
court justice powell warning them that business is losing control over the society
and something has to be done to counter these forces of course he puts it in terms of defense
defending ourselves against outside power
but if you look at it it's a call for business to use its control over resources to carry out a major offensive
to beat back this democratizing wave
[Music]
over on the liberal side there's something exactly similar the first
major report of the trilateral commission is concerned with this
it's called the crisis of democracy trilateral commission is liberal
internationalists their flavors indicated by the fact that they pretty much staffed the carter
administration [Music]
they were also appalled by the democratizing tendencies of the 60s and thought we have to react to it
they were concerned that there was an excess of democracy developing [Music]
previously passive and obedient parts of the population
what are sometimes called the special interest that we're beginning to organize and try to enter the political
arena and they said that imposes too much pressure on the state it can't deal with
all these pressures so therefore they have to return to passivity and become depoliticized
they were particularly concerned with what was happening to young people the young people are getting too free and
independent
the way they put it there's a failure on the part of the schools the universities and churches
the institutions responsible for the indoctrination of the young their phrase not mine
[Music] if you look at their study there's one interest they never mentioned
private business and that makes sense they're not special interests they're the national interest kind of by definition so they're okay
they're allowed to you know have lobbyists uh buy campaign staff the executive make
decisions that's fine but it's the rest the special interests the general population who have to be subdued
[Music]
well that's the spectrum it's the kind of ideological level of the backlash but
the major backlash which wasn't parallel to this was just redesigning the economy
Redesigning the Economy
[Music]
since the 1970s there's been a concerted effort on the part of the
masters of mankind the owners of the society to shift the economy in two crucial
respects one to increase the role of financial
institutions banks investment firms so on insurance companies
by 2007 right before the latest crash they had literally 40 percent of corporate
profits [Music] far beyond anything in the past
[Music]
back in the 1950s as for many years before the united states economy was
based largely on production the united states was the great manufacturing center of the world
[Music]
financial institutions used to be a relatively small part of the economy and
their task was to distribute unused assets like say
bank savings to productive activity the bank always has on hand a reserve of
money received from the stockholders and depositors on the basis of these cash reserves a bank can create credit so
besides providing a safe place for depositing money a bank serves a community by making
additional credit available for many purposes for a manufacturer to meet his payroll during slack selling period for
a merchant to enlarge and remodel his store and for many other good reasons why people are always needing more
credit than they have immediately available that's a contribution to the economy
regulatory system was established banks were regulated the commercial investment
banks were separated cut back very risky investment practices that could harm
private people there had been remember no financial crashes during the period of regulation
by the 1970s that changed
you started getting a huge increase in the flows of speculative capital just astronomically increased
enormous changes in the financial sector from traditional banks to risky investments
complex financial instruments money manipulations and so on increasingly the business of the
country isn't production at least not here the primary business here is business
you can even see it in the choice of directors so a director of a major american
corporation back in the 50s and 60s was very likely to be an engineer as somebody who graduated from a place like
mit maybe industrial management more recently the directorship and the
top managerial positions are people who came out of business schools learned financial uh trickery of various kinds
and so on by the 1970s say general electric can
make more profit playing games with money than you could by producing in the
united states [Music] we have to remember that general
electric is substantially a financial institution today it makes half its profits just by moving
money around in complicated ways and it's very unclear that they're doing anything that's of value to the economy
so that's one phenomenon what's called financialization of the economy
going along with that is the offshoring of production [Music]
[Music] the trade system was reconstructed
with a very explicit design of putting working people in competition
with one another all over the world [Music] and what it's led to is a reduction
in the share of income on the part of working people
it's been particularly striking in the united states but it's happening worldwide it means that an american worker is in competition with a super
exploited worker in china meanwhile highly paid professionals are
protected they're not placed in competition with the rest of the world far from it
and of course capital is free to move workers aren't free to move labor can't move but capital can
well again going back to the classics like adam smith as he pointed out
free circulation of labor is the foundation of any free trade system but workers are pretty much stuck
the wealthy and the privileged are protected so you get obvious consequences and they're recognized and in fact praised
policy is designed to increase insecurity alan greenspan and when he testified to
congress he explained his success in running the economy as based on what he
called greater worker insecurity atypical restraint on compensation
increases has been evident for a few years now but as i outlined in some detail in testimony last month
i believe that job insecurity has played the dominant role keep workers insecure they're going to
be under control they're not going to ask for say decent
wages or decent working conditions or the opportunity of free association
meaning unionized now for the masters of mankind that's fine they make their profits
but for the population it's devastating well these two processes
financialization and offshoring are part of what led to the
vicious cycle of concentration of wealth concentration of power
AntiAmericanism
i'm noam chomsky i'm a on the faculty at mit and i've been
getting more heavily involved in anti-war activities for the last few years [Music]
gnome chomsky has made two international reputations the widest is as one of the national leaders of american resistance
to the vietnam war the deepest is as a professor of linguistics who before he was 40 years
old had transformed the nature of his subject you are identified with the new left
whatever that is you certainly have been an activist as well as a writer
professor noam chomsky is listed in anybody's catalogs among the half dozen
top heroes of the new left the standing he achieved by adopting over the past two or three years a
series of adamant positions projecting at least american foreign
policy at most america itself
well actually this notion anti-american is quite an interesting one it's actually a totalitarian notion
it isn't used in free societies so if someone in say italy
is criticizing berlusconi or the corruption of the italian state
and so on they're not called anti-italian in fact if they were called anti-italian people would collapse some
laughter at the streets of rome or milan in totalitarian states the notions used
so in the old soviet union dissidents were called anti-soviet that
was the worst condemnation in the brazilian military dictatorship they
were called anti-brazilian [Music] now it's true that in just about every
society that critics are maligned are mistreated
different ways depending on the nature of the society like in soviet union saying botslav
however would be imprisoned in a u.s dependency like el salvador at
the same time his counterparts have their brains blown out by the u.s run state terrorist forces
and other societies that just condemned they're vilified and so on and in the united states yeah know
one of the terms of abuse is anti-american there's a couple of others like you know
marx's there's an array of terms of abuse but in the united states you have a very
high degree of freedom and so if you're vilified by some commas ours who cares
you go on do your work anyway these concepts only arise in a culture where if you criticize state
power and by state i mean more generally not just government but state corporate power
if you criticize concentrated power you're against the society you're against the people that's quite striking
that it's used in the united states in fact as far as i know the only democratic society where the concept
isn't just ridiculed it's a sign of elements of the elite culture which are
quite ugly [Music]
The Golden Age
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
the american dream like many ideals was partly symbolic but partly real
so in the 1950s and 60s there was the biggest growth period in
american economic history the golden age
[Music] it was pretty egalitarian growth so the
the lowest a fifth of the population was improving about as much as the upper fifth
and there were some welfare state measures which improved life for much of the population
it was for example possible for a a black worker to get a decent job in an
auto plant [Music] buy a home get a car have his children go to school
and so on and the same across the board
when the u.s was primarily a manufacturing center it had
to be concerned with its own consumers here famously henry ford
raised the salary of his workers who would be able to buy cars
[Music] when you're moving into an international
plutonomy as the banks like to call it with a small percentage of the world's population
that's gathering increasing wealth what happens to american consumers is a
much less concern because most of them aren't going to be consuming your products anyway at least on a major basis
your goals are profit in the next quarter even if it's based on financial manipulations
uh high salary high bonuses produce overseas if you have to and produce for the
wealthy classes here and their counterparts abroad what about the rest well there's a term coming into use for
them too they're called the precariat precarious proletariat
the working people of the world who live increasingly precarious lives
and it's related to the attitude toward the country altogether
during the period of great growth of the economy 50s and 60s but in fact earlier
taxes on the wealthy were far higher corporate taxes were much higher
the taxes on dividends were much higher simply taxes on wealth were much higher
the tax system has been redesigned so that the taxes that are paid by the
very wealthy are reduced and correspondingly the tax burden on the rest of the population's increased
[Music]
now the shift is towards trying to keep taxes just on wages and on consumption which
everyone has to do not say on dividends which only go to the rich
[Music] the numbers are pretty striking [Music]
now there's a pretext of course there's always a pretext the pretext in this case is well that increases investment
and increases jobs but there isn't any evidence for that if you want to increase investment give money to the
poor and the working people they have to keep alive so they spend their incomes that stimulates production stimulates
investment it leads to job growth and so on
if you're an ideologist for the masters you have a different line and in fact right now it's almost absurd that
corporations have money coming out of their pockets so in fact general electric are paying
zero taxes and they have enormous profits lets them take the profit somewhere else or defer it but not pay
taxes and this is common
the major american corporations shift the burden of sustaining the society onto the rest of the population
Solidarity
work
solidarity is quite dangerous from the point of view the masters you're only supposed to care about yourself
and not about other people this is quite different from the people they claim are their heroes like
adam smith who based his whole approach to the economy on the principle that sympathy is a fundamental human trait
but that has to be driven out of people's heads i gotta wait for yourself follow the wild max and don't care about
others which is okay for the rich and powerful but is devastating for everyone else
well you know it's taken a lot of effort to try to drive these basic human emotions out of people's
heads [Music] and we see it today in policy formation
for example in the attack on social security
social security is based on a principle it's based on a principle of solidarity
solidarity caring for others
social security means i pay payroll taxes so that the widow across town can get
something to live on for much of the population that's what they survive on
it's of no use to the very rich so therefore there's a concerted attempt to destroy it
one of the ways is defunding it you want to destroy some system first defund it
uh then it won't work people be angry they want something else that's a standard technique for
privatizing some system
we see it in the attack on public schools of public schools are based on the
principle of solidarity i no longer have children in school they're grown up
but the principle of solidarity says i happily paid taxes so that the kid across the street can go
to school that's normal human emotion i have to drive that out of people's heads
i don't have kids in school why should i pay taxes privatize it so on
the public education system all the way from kindergarten to higher education
is under severe attack i mean that's one of the jewels of american society
[Music]
[Music] you go back to the golden age again the great growth period
in the 50s and 60s a lot of that is based on free public education
one of the results of the second world war was the gi bill of rights which enabled veterans and remember
that's a large part of the population and to go to college they wouldn't have been able to otherwise they essentially
got free education where a community state or nation courageously invests a
substantial share of its resources in education the investment invariably is returned in
better business and the higher standard of living us was way in the lead in developing extensive mass public
education at every level [Music] by now more than half the states most of
the funding for the colleges comes from tuition not from the state that's a radical change and
that's a terrible burden on students it means that students if they don't come from very wealthy families
they're going to leave college with big debts and if you have a big debt you're trapped i mean maybe you wanted to
become a public interest lawyer but you're going to have to go into a corporate law firm to pay off those debts and by the time
you're part of the culture you know you're not going to get out of it again and that's true across the board
in the 1950s there's a much poorer society than it is today but nevertheless could easily handle
essentially free mass higher education a much richer society claims doesn't
have the resources for it that's uh just what's going on right
before our eyes that's the general attack on uh principles that
i mean not only are they humane they're the basis of the prosperity
and health of this society
[Music]
Regulation
foreign
[Music]
if you look over the history of regulation say a railroad regulation financial
regulation and so on you find that quite commonly it's it's either initiated by
the uh economic concentrations that are being regulated
or it's supported by them and the reason is because they know that
sooner or later they can take over the regulators
and it ends up with what's called regulatory capture the business being regulated is in fact
running the regulators
[Music] bank lobbyists are actually writing the
laws of financial regulation it gets to that extreme and that's been happening through
history and again it's it's a pretty natural tendency when you just look at the distribution of power
[Music] one of the things that
expanded enormously in the 1970s is lobbying as the business world moved sharply to
try to control legislation business world was pretty upset by the
advances in public welfare in the 60s and particularly by richard nixon
it's not too well understood but he was the last new deal president and they regarded that as class
treachery in nixon's administration you get consumer safety legislation
safety and health regulations in the workplace the epa the environmental protection
agency business didn't like it of course they didn't like the high taxes they didn't
like the regulation and they began a coordinated effort to try to overcome it
lobbying sharply increased deregulation began with a real ferocity
there were no financial crashes in the 50s and the 60s because the regulatory apparatus of the new deal was
still in place [Music]
it began to be dismantled under business pressure and political pressure you get more and more crashes
[Music]
and it goes on right through the years 70s sort of starts to begin
80s really takes off congress was asked to approve federal loan guarantees to the auto company of up to one and one
half billion dollars all of this is quite safe as long as you know the government's going to come to
your rescue so take say reagan instead of letting them pay the cost reagan bailed out the
banks like continental illinois the biggest bailout of american history at the time
actually ended his term with a huge financial crisis the savings and loan crisis and the government moved in and
bailed it out president bush they signed the 300 billion dollar savings and loan bailout bill in 1999 regulation was
dismantled to separate commercial banks from investment banks
then comes the bush then obama bailout bear stearns is running to the feds to stay afloat president bush today
defended the decision to bail out citigroup fannie mae and freddie mac have asked for a total of three billion
dollars more this bailout could get much bigger signaling deepening troubles for the u.s economy
[Music] and they're building up the next one
[Music]
[Music]
each time the taxpayer is called on to bail out those who created the crisis
increasingly the major financial institutions in a capitalist economy you wouldn't do
that in a capitalist system that would wipe out the investors who made risky investments
but the rich and powerful they don't want a capitalist system they want to be able to run to the nanny
state as soon as they're in trouble and get bailed out by the taxpayer that's called too big to fail
i mean there are nobel laureates in economics who significantly disagree with the course that we're following
people like stiglitz paul krugman and others none of them were even approached
the people picked to fix the crisis were those who created it the robert rubin crowd the goldman sachs
crowd they created the crisis are now more powerful than before
is that accident well not when you pick those people to create an economic plan i mean what do
you expect to happen
meanwhile for the poor let market principles prevail don't expect any help from the government the
government's the problem not the solution and so on that's essentially neoliberalism uh and it has this dual
character which goes right back in economic history one set of rules for the rich
opposite set of rules for the poor nothing surprising about this it's
exactly the dynamics you'd expect and if the population allows it to proceed it's just going to go on and on like this
until the next crash which is so much expected that credit agencies which kind of
evaluate the status of firms are now counting into their calculations
the taxpayer bailout that they expect to come after the next crash
which means that the beneficiaries of these credit ratings like the big banks
they can borrow money more cheaply they can push out smaller competitors and you get more and more concentration
everywhere you look policies are denied this way which should come as absolutely no surprise to anyone that's what happens
when you put power into the hands of a narrow sector of
wealth which will is dedicated to increasing power for itself just as you'd expect
Citizens United
[Music]
concentration of wealth yields concentration of political power
particularly so as the cost of elections skyrockets which kind of forces the political
parties into the pockets of major corporations
the citizens united this was january 2009 i guess
that's a very important decision supreme court decision but it has a history and you've got to
think about the history the 14th amendment has a provision that
says no person's rights can be infringed without due process of law
and the intent clearly was to protect freed slaves says okay they
have got the protection of the law i don't think it's ever been used for freed slaves if ever marginally
almost immediately it was used for businesses corporations their rights can't be infringed without
due process of law so they gradually became persons under the law
[Music] corporations are
state-created legal fictions [Music]
maybe they're good maybe they're bad but to call them persons is kind of outrageous so they got personal rights
back about a century ago and that extended through the 20th century
they give corporations rights way beyond what persons have so if say general
motors invests in mexico they get national rights the rights of a mexican
business while the notion of person was expanded to include corporations it was also
restricted if you take the 14th amendment literally then no undocumented alien can be
deprived of rights if they're persons
undocumented aliens who are living here and building your buildings cleaning your lawns and so on they're not persons
but general electric is a person an immortal a super powerful person this
perversion of the you know elementary morality and the obvious meaning of the
law is quite incredible in the 1970s the courts decided that
money is a form of speech buckley versus valiant then you go on
through the years to citizens united which says that the right of free speech of corporations namely spend as much
money they want can't be curtailed
take a look what that means it means that corporations which anyway have been pretty much buying elections
are now free to do it with virtually no constraint that's tremendous attack on the
residue of democracy [Music]
it's very interesting to read the rulings like justice kennedy's swing vote his ruling said well look after all
cbs is given freedom of speech they're a corporation why shouldn't general electric be free to spend as much money
as they want [Music] i mean it's true that cbs has given freedom of speech but they're supposed
to be performing a public service that's why that's what the press is supposed to be
the general electric is just trying to make money for the chief executive some of the shareholders
it's an incredible decision and it puts the country in a position where business power is
greatly extended beyond what it always was this is part of that vicious cycle
the supreme court justices are put in by reactionary presidents who get in there because they're funded by business it's
the way the cycle works [Music]
[Music]
there is one organized force which traditionally plenty of flaws but with all its flaws
it's been in the forefront of efforts to improve the lives of the
general population that's organized labor it's also a barrier to corporate tyranny so it's the one barrier to this
vicious cycle going on which does lead to corporate tyranny
a major reason for the concentrated almost fanatic attack on unions on
organized labor is they are a democratizing force [Applause] they provide a barrier that defends
workers rights but also popular rights generally [Music]
and that interferes with the prerogatives and power of those who own
and manage the society i should say that anti-union
sentiment in the united states among elites is so strong that the fundamental core of labor
rights the basic principle in the international labor organization
is the right of free association which would mean the right to form unions the us has never ratified that
so i think the u.s may be alone among major societies in that respect
it's considered so far out of the spectrum of american politics it literally has never been considered
remember that the u.s has a long and very violent labor history as compared with comparable societies
but the labor movement had been very strong that by the 1920s
in the period not unlike today it was virtually crushed truck driver strike
was climaxed by severe with many casualties open warfare rages through the streets
of the city as three thousand union pickets battle 700 police guns tear gas clubs and fists bring
injuries to more than 80 persons and cause the death of two
by the mid-30s it began to reconstruct [Music]
franklin dylan or roosevelt he himself was rather sympathetic to progressive legislation that would be in the benefit
of the general population but he had to somehow get it passed so he informed
the labor leaders and others forced me to do it what he meant is
go out and demonstrate organize protest develop the labor movement
when the popular pressure is sufficient i'll be able to put through the legislation you want i am not for a
return to that definition of liberty under which for many years a free people
were being gradually regimented into the service of a privileged few
i prefer that broader definition of liberty
so there was a kind of a combination of a sympathetic government and by the mid 30s very substantial
popular activism there were industrial actions there were
sit-down strikes which were very frightening to ownership
have to recognize a sit-down strike is just one step before saying
we don't need bosses we can run this by ourselves
and business was pulled you read the business press say in the late 30s they
were talking about the hazard facing industrialists and the
rising political power of the masses which has to be repressed things were on hold during the second
world war but immediately after the second world war the business offensive began in force
taft-hartley act the taft-hartley act was written for only one purpose
to restore justice and equality in labor management relations
mccarthyism was used for a massive corporate propaganda offensives to attack union
increased sharply during the reagan years i mean reagan pretty much told the business world if you want to
illegally break organizing efforts and strikes go ahead they are in violation of the
law and if they do not report for work within 48 hours they have forfeited
their jobs and will be terminated continued in the 90s and of course with
george w bush who went through the roof by now less than seven percent of
private sector workers have unions [Music]
the effect is that the usual counter force to an offensive by our
highly class conscious business class has dissolved
now if you're in position of power you want to maintain class consciousness
for yourself but eliminate it everywhere else you go back to the 19th century
in the early days of the industrial revolution in the united states working people were very conscious of
this they in fact overwhelmingly regarded
wage labor as not very different from slavery different only in that it was temporary
in fact it was such a popular idea that was a slogan of the republican party well that was a
very sharp class consciousness in the interests of power and privilege
it's good to drive those ideas out of people's heads you don't want them to know that they're an oppressed class
so this is one of the few societies which you just don't talk about class in fact the notion of class is very
simple who gives the orders who follows them that basically defines class
uh it's more nuanced and complex but that's basically it
Advertising
[Music]
the public relations industry the advertising industry which is dedicated to creating consumers it's a phenomenon
developed in the freest countries in britain in the united states and the reason is pretty clear it became
clear by say a century ago that it was not going to be so easy to control the population by force too much
freedom has been won labor organizing parliamentary labor parties in many countries women started
to get the franchise and so on so you had to have other means of controlling people and it was understood and expressed that
you have to control them by control of beliefs and attitudes well one of the
best ways to control people in terms of attitudes is
what the great political economist thursday webline called fabricating consumers
[Music] if you can fabricate once
make obtaining things that are just about within your reach the essence of life they're going to be trapped into
becoming consumers you read the business press say 1920s it
talks about the need to direct people to the superficial things of life
like fashionable consumption and that will keep them out of our hair
you find this doctrine all through progressive intellectual thought like walter lipman
the major progressive intellectual of the 20th century he wrote
famous progressive essays on democracy and wish his view was exactly that the public must be put in their place
so that the responsible men can make decisions without interference from the bewildered herd
there to be spectators not participants then you get a properly functioning democracy
straight back to madison and on to powell's memorandum and so on and the
advertising industry just exploded with this as its goal fabricating
consumers
and it's done with great sophistication you don't see many wild stallions
anymore he's one of the last of a wild and very singular breed come to
marlborough country [Music] the ideal is what you actually see today
where let's say teenage girls if they have a free saturday afternoon i'll go walking in the shopping mall
not to the library or somewhere else the idea is to try to control everyone
to turn the whole society into the perfect system [Music]
perfect system would be a society based on a dyad a pair
the pair is you and your television set or maybe now you and the internet
in which that presents you with what the proper life would be what kind of gadgets you should have and you spend
your time and effort gaining those things which you don't need you don't want maybe you'll throw them away
but that's the measure of a decent life
what we see is in say advertising on television if you've ever taken an economics course you know
that markets are supposed to be based on informed consumers making rational
choices well if we had a system like that a market system
uh then a television ad would consist of say general motors putting up information saying here's
what we have for sale that's not what a an ad for a car is an ad for a car is a
football hero you know an actress the car doing some crazy thing like
going up a mountain or something the point is to create uninformed consumers who will make
irrational choices that's what advertising is all about uh and
when the same institutions pr uh system runs elections they do it the
same way
they want to create an uninformed electorate which will make irrational choices
often against their own interests and we see it every time one of these extravaganzas take place
right after the election uh president obama won an award from the advertising industry for the
best marketing campaign and wasn't reported here if you go to the international business press
executives were euphoric they said we've been selling candidates marketing candidates
like you know toothpaste ever since reagan and this is the greatest achievement we have i don't usually
agree with sarah palin but when she mocks the what she calls the hopi changey stuff
she's right first of all obama didn't really promise anything that's mostly illusion
you go back to the campaign rhetoric and take a look at it there's very little discussion of policy issues and for very
good reason because public opinion on policy is sharply
disconnected from what the two-party leadership and their financial backers
want policy more and more is focused on the
private interests that fund the campaigns with the public being marginalized
one of the leading political scientists martin gillens came out for the study of the relation between public attitudes
and public policy what he shows is that about 70 of the population has no way of
influencing policy they might as well be in some other country
and the population knows it what it's led to is a population that's
angry and frustrated hates institutions
it's not acting constructively to try to respond to this [Music]
there is popular mobilization and activism but in very self-destructive directions
it's taking the form of unfocused anger attacks on one another
and on vulnerable targets that's what happens in cases like this
it is corrosive of social relations but that's the point the point is to make people
hate and fear each other and look out only for themselves and don't do anything for anyone else
one place you see it strikingly is on april 15th april 15th is kind of a measure the day
you pay your taxes of how democratic a society is if it to the if society is really
democratic april 15th would be a day of celebration it's a day when the population gets
together decides to fund the programs and activities that they
have formulated and agreed upon which could be better than that so you should celebrate it it's not the way it is in
the united states it's a day of mourning it's a day in which some
alien power you know has nothing to do with you is coming down to steal your hard-earned
money and you do everything you can to keep them from doing it well that is a kind of a measure of the
extent to which at least in popular consciousness democracy is actually functioning
not a very attractive picture [Music]
[Music] the tendencies that we've been describing within american society
unless they're reversed it's going to be an extremely ugly society a society that's based on
adam smith's vile maxim you know all for myself nothing for anyone else
[Music] a society in which normal human
instincts and emotion of sympathy solidarity mutual support in which they're kind of like driven out
that's a society so ugly i don't even know who'd want to live in it i wouldn't want my children to
if the society is based on control by private wealth
it will reflect the values that in fact does reflect
the value that is green and the desire to maximize personal gain at the expense of others now any society made a small
society based on that principle is ugly but it can survive a global society based on that principle
is headed for massive destruction [Music]
i don't think we're smart enough to design in any detail what a
perfectly just and free society would be like i think we can give some guidelines
and more significant we can ask how we can progress in that direction
john dewey the leading social philosopher in the late 20th century he argued that until all institutions
production commerce media unless they're all
under participatory democratic control we will not have a functioning democratic society
as he put it policy will be the shadow cast by business over society
well that's essentially true [Music]
where there are structures of authority domination and hierarchy somebody gives the order somebody takes them
they are not self-justifying they have to justify themselves
they have a burden of proof to me [Music]
well if you take a close look usually you find they can't justify themselves if they can't we ought to be dismantling
them trying to expand the domain of freedom and justice by dismantling that form of
illegitimate authority and in fact progress over the years
but we all thankfully recognize this progress has been just that the way things change is because lots of people
are working all the time and you know they're working in their communities in their workplace or wherever they happen to be
and they're building up the basis for popular movements which are going to make changes
that's the way everything has ever happened in history it takes a freedom of speech
one of the real achievements of american society it's first in the world in that it's not in the bill of rights
it's not not the constitution freedom of speech issues began to come to the supreme court
in the early 20th century the major contributions came in the 1960s
one of the leading ones was a case involving the civil rights movement well by then you had a mass popular movement
which was demanding rights refusing to back down and in that
context the supreme court did establish a pretty high standard of freedom speech
or it takes a women's right women also began identifying oppressive structures
refusing to accept them bringing other people to join with them well that's how rights are won
to a non-trivial extent i've also spent a lot of my life in activism i mean that
doesn't show up publicly but yeah actually i'm not terribly good at it not the greatest organizer i think that we
can see quite clearly some very very serious defects and flaws in our society our level of culture our institutions
which are going to have to be corrected by operating outside of the framework that is commonly accepted i think we're
going to have to find new ways of political action [Music]
but the activists are people who have created the rights that we enjoy
they're not only carrying out uh policies based on information that they're receiving but
also contributing to the understanding remember it's a reciprocal process
you try to do things you learn you learn about what the world is like that feeds back to the understanding of
how to go on there's huge opportunities
it is a very free society it's still the freest in the world [Music]
government has very limited capacity to coerce corporate business may try to coerce but
they don't know the mechanism so there's a lot that can be done if people organize struggle for their
rights as they've done in the past and can win many victories
[Music] well my close friend for many years late howard's in
to put it in his words that what matters is the countless small deeds of unknown
people who lay the basis for the significant events that enter history
they're the ones who've done things in the past they're the ones who'll have to do it in the future
[Music]
[Music]
====
1,028 Comments
====
@ThaisDaRosa-r8o
1 month ago
I’m almost 80, a former history teacher, and have lived through enough history myself to really appreciate Chomsky’s critique of the past. Since studying his From Deep to Surface Structure (on linguistics) in the ‘70s, he’s been by favorite thinker… never having sold out to corporations or politicos… he’s the independent mind I wish we had more of in this country. Just wish he had written a textbook on modern world history that I could have used in my 40+ years of teaching (though that text might never would have sold in Texas, or a lot of other Right of Center states)! Thank you deeply Professor for your life so well spent!
79
Reply
6 replies
@tiredcaballero
9 months ago (edited)
Thank you, Professor Chomsky
..for a lifetime of service like no other
273
Reply
9 replies
@richardhedd3080
1 year ago
Thank you to all of the people who made this video possible, and thank you so much for posting this video. This is the most important critical analysis of america ever made.
235
Reply
2 replies
@omarmahfouz5599
5 months ago
The Greatest! While its extremely sad that he is in his final days and have ceased to appear publicy..I am also very grateful he live to 95+ years offering decade after decade of wisdom and moral guidance.
87
Reply
6 replies
@ChooseCompassion
1 year ago (edited)
I’ve sent this to everybody I know and tell everybody I know about it because it seems like too many people do not understand the truth of what’s going on and this is a good crash course to get them started. I am so grateful to Noam Chomsky.
275
Reply
24 replies
@louisesumrell6331
11 months ago (edited)
Breaking solidarity is making sure that people are frightened and directing the anger reaction into hatred for the "other". Fear/hatred of the "other" is a classic, from time immemorial.
120
Reply
9 replies
@WolfgangVonKempelen838
1 year ago
Noam Chomsky: the definition of a wise and decent human being
158
Reply
3 replies
@patrickgeorge7994
9 months ago (edited)
All Americans need to watch this documentary . This should be show in all American High School Civics classes now !
57
Reply
8 replies
@themancaveclub
11 months ago
This is the absolute most important analysis of our present system! Our democracy has been contorted into a plutocracy.
50
Reply
4 replies
@safire2010
1 year ago (edited)
The best way to control less fortunate people is by scaring them financially and emotionally. Inflation does both.
419
Reply
51 replies
@StevenBeeney-b5t
1 year ago
Best ever version of Chomsky's thesis! His usual expert scholarly tone is edited down to concise vernacular, w/o sacrificing any supreme authority. A sweeping tour de force.
55
Reply
@DFM3333
4 months ago (edited)
❤Noam Chomsky is in a class of his own . Everything he has said in his lifetime is a warning about the consequences of inequality❤the concentration of wealth and power translates into legislation ❤the government works for the very few❤
33
Reply
2 replies
@MikeMurphy-c5m
3 months ago
Very very POWERFUL INFORMATION! EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE FAMILY NIGHT AND WATCH THIS!!! ❤
23
Reply
@degacci
8 months ago
This is the greatest documentary I’ve seen in a LONG time. It’s pieced together very well 👏
18
Reply
1 reply
@keithgreenwade8808
1 year ago
Oh Boy!!! Thank God for the internet, wouldn't see this on TV.
71
Reply
1 reply
@marcobsomer5574
2 weeks ago
merveilleux exposé pour l'humanité. Merci.
5
Reply
@dvleft
1 year ago
This is brilliant and motivational. The challenge, ironically, is organising. With such a jump in communication tech and platforms it should be easy to organise and inform. The reality is quite different. We owe Mr. Chomsky a lot. We mostly learn through observation and he has been a great and important influence in that respect.
100
Reply
9 replies
@sulandelemere
1 year ago
Looking at the pictures of students in the 50s makes me realize we're in a dystopia now.
59
Reply
4 replies
@volodymyryurenko3030
5 months ago
Thank you Prof. Noam Chomsky for your incredible contribution.
15
Reply
@jtempleton1465
1 year ago
Not nearly enough views. Please post this on as many platforms as possible. Thank you for sharing this vital information. Mr. Chomsky is brilliant! 🙏👏
12
Reply
@hosseinjalalpoor1161
1 year ago
I like to sleep on a pillow of Noam chamskies speeches. Love this guy talk
47
Reply
@garyjohnson1466
11 months ago
No doubt professor Chomsky isn’t very popular with corporate institutions and republicans, when he passes away, they will privately celebrate, however, Norm Chomsky is and has always been a champion of the common man, a voice for true democracy….
70
Reply
8 replies
@bigbizz3503
1 year ago (edited)
Our very first day of school, was our very first day of institutionalization, indoctrination, and ideologies today. Because our minds are innocent and shapable at that age. John D. Rockefeller designed the American Education System. He stated: I don't want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers.” Even more compelling are the words of Frederick T Gates, business advisor to Rockefeller: “We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or of science." Makes me mad that we are falling for all of their BULLSH*T.
42
Reply
1 reply
@brucewalters8635
1 year ago
This is what opened my eyes to the way our goverment really works. It hurt to know the truth but I've continued to learn more and expand my consciousness over the past 11 years.
30
Reply
2 replies
@tangoitaly
11 months ago
Thank you so much for this excellent documentary. Such a panoramic overview, a must see if you want clarity on our western society, I live in Australia and it is equally applicable.
20
Reply
@TheBrankagajo
1 year ago
Thank you so much for explaining what many of us have been anticipating.
17
Reply
@brockfacione3297
1 year ago
The most important video on YouTube with less than a half million views.
39
Reply
2 replies
@teletranoats7491
1 year ago
As a teacher I am doing my part. The more I spread this video online so people can watch it...the less there will be buying shares in the stock market. Math never fails !
48
Reply
2 replies
@Aqoonyahan21st
2 months ago
Noam Chomsky and John Searle are my favorite philosophers in 21st century!
Long life and legacy!
8
Reply
@turtleanton6539
1 year ago
Very great stuff.
So informative 😊
31
Reply
@rodrigo_dmatoss
1 year ago
You should be ashamed that this man isn't in The New York Times every week.
63
Reply
11 replies
@GoldenGateNum9
5 months ago
Shocking this doesn't have millions of views... this is very terryfying to watch, and quite grim... however, I do believe that a higher power will always send someone like Prof. Noam Chomsky, Martin Luther King Jr. or Gandhi along to us when the time is right, when people are in most need of special people like these ..🌹♥️🌹 With Love, Shan 🌹♥️🌹
16
Reply
3 replies
@ryanpetty8843
9 months ago
The saddest part of this masterclass in sociopolitical analysis is that I can’t get a single person I know to take interest in this despite it explaining, in great detail, everything they complain about.
86
Reply
9 replies
@jonathaneffemey944
3 days ago
Thanks so much for posting
Reply
@1kleberito
9 months ago
Thank you for posting this great documentary, thank you Noam Chomsky for all your knowledge and for helping us to open our eyes.
8
Reply
@withaak
1 year ago
Where to begin. True words that people ignore at their risk.
27
Reply
@aimardom
10 months ago
Bravo, Noam. You are a paradigm.
24
Reply
1 reply
@sennearaslan1551
2 months ago
0:00 - Intro
3:00 - Requiem for the American Dream
4:35 - The 10 Principles of the Concentration of Wealth and Power
6:55 - Principle 1 - Reduce Democracy
12:55 - Principle 2 - Shape Ideology
16:32 - Principle 3 - Redesign the Economy
26:56 - Principle 4 - Shift the Burden
32:06 - Principle 5 - Attack Solidarity
37:07 - Principle 6 - Run the Regulators
43:45 - Principle 7 - Engineer Elections
48:00 - Principle 8 - Keep the Rabble in Line
54:53 - Principle 9 - Manufacture Consent
1:01:04 - Principle 10 - Marginalize the Population
1:07:13 - Course Correct Outside of Commonly Accepted Framework
2
Reply
@iansweet8978
7 months ago
Gotta love it when your Chomsky gets interrupted by ads.
27
Reply
2 replies
@syberjamie
1 year ago
Wow! This man is a virtual suppository of wisdom. Thanks for posting!
12
Reply
3 replies
@wadejameskennedy4495
10 months ago
thank you very much for a most enlightening presentation. N.C. the people’s Hero.
9
Reply
No comments:
Post a Comment